Quick post to let you know a contestant call has gone out for a new show (tentatively) called The Hive (email casting@saltbeeftv.com for an application form). From the press release:
"The series of 13x30min episodes is a smart, play-along quiz where the answer to every question is literally staring contestants in the face. The Hive is the quiz where knowing the right answer isn’t enough because all answers are hidden in a hive, testing players’ general knowledge and mental agility as they race against the clock to find the answer."
It's for BBC Four, so presumably will be at the, well, at the BBC Four end of the spectrum. Plus the flyer (below) spells 'crossword' with a hyphen, so you can already tell this a highbrow affair.
A blog about quizzes by trivia nuts.
Each week, quiz obsessives and Only Connect champions
Jamie Karran (@NoDrNo) and Michael Wallace (@statacake)
take on the pub quizzes of the world.
Find out every Friday if you could have helped with the questions they got wrong.
Showing posts with label game show. Show all posts
Showing posts with label game show. Show all posts
Monday, 16 March 2015
Sunday, 6 April 2014
Review: (All new!) Fifteen to One
Saturday saw the hotly anticipated return of Channel 4's Fifteen to One, a show that, if you're reading a blog about quizzes, really needs no introduction. Off air for over a decade, we were given a taste of things to come last September with a celebrity special hosted by Adam Hills. Now a 20-episode series with normal folk will be gracing our screens. Everyone's favourite Dane Sandi Toksvig is in charge and there's a whopping £40,000 up for grabs. Can it possibly live up to expectations?
So what's new?
In terms of basic gameplay the reboot is near-identical to its predecessor. 15 contestants, three lives each, last quizzer standing makes it onto the leaderboard. With 19 episodes before the final you just have to avoid being one of the four lowest-scoring winners if you want to come back and battle it out for the cash. The only major rule change is that anyone knocked out before the final three gets (up to) two more bites at the cherry. While this may seem like the famously ruthless show going just a tiny bit soft, it seems a sensible change for a contest that could send you packing after facing just two questions.
With Toksvig the show is in safe, experienced hands, while her intellect and warmth make her an excellent match for a quiz known for being challenging but always friendly. The set design works well enough, with some neat floor lighting that shows who's in, who's out, and who's nominating whom. Question difficulty seemed a bit low overall, but with some absolute stinkers thrown in you certainly needed a bit of luck along with solid general knowledge. While this volatility is an inevitable part of the game it strikes me as very easy for someone to come out feeling rather hard done by. The extra chances to appear do mitigate this somewhat, though.
For better or worse?
Comparisons with the original are inevitable, and much of the online discourse I've seen has focused on the show's length. Coming in (with ad breaks) at an hour the remake is twice as long and, with no extra quizzing to fill the gap, that time has to be made up elsewhere. A bit of extra chat, some bonus information after some questions, and an overall slower pace do the trick, which together leaves it without the original's trademark 'efficiency'. Understandably, this has disappointed the more devout fans, who were hoping for a return to the veritable barrage of questions that used to grace our teatime TV screens. However, if the remake is viewed on its own merits (rather than in the shadow of William G Stewart) I think it largely stands up to scrutiny.
As a case in point I recently introduced my partner - who had never seem the show before - to some old episodes on YouTube. He is, of course, a fairly serious quizzer himself now, but viewing it with fresh eyes he found the pace too fast for comfort. While to me, Saturday's episode certainly felt slow, in the context of many of the current crop of quiz shows its questions-per-minute seemed perfectly respectable.
Fifteen to Fun?
Overall then, it's a perfectly fine remake of an undisputed classic. It will be interesting, however, to see how it fares with the viewing public; ultimately I'm not entirely sure who it's trying to please. For quiz purists it will certainly feel like a rather diluted imitation of the original. The more casual viewer, on the other hand, seems liable to tire of a 'question question question' format once the nostalgia novelty wears off. A 4.30pm time slot is a curious choice, as it means an overlap with gameshow goliaths Pointless and The Chase. Perhaps the idea is to lure viewers in and hope they'll hang on to 'see what happens', but as the opening round suffers the most from the ponderous pacing I'm not so sure.
For now, though, I'm happy to have it back. Perhaps there's a touch of expat-induced homesickness creeping in from my new life in the colonies, but while they may be slightly slower on their feet, it's always nice to see an old friend again.
So what's new?
In terms of basic gameplay the reboot is near-identical to its predecessor. 15 contestants, three lives each, last quizzer standing makes it onto the leaderboard. With 19 episodes before the final you just have to avoid being one of the four lowest-scoring winners if you want to come back and battle it out for the cash. The only major rule change is that anyone knocked out before the final three gets (up to) two more bites at the cherry. While this may seem like the famously ruthless show going just a tiny bit soft, it seems a sensible change for a contest that could send you packing after facing just two questions.
![]() |
| Floor lighting gives a snapshot of the state of play. |
For better or worse?
Comparisons with the original are inevitable, and much of the online discourse I've seen has focused on the show's length. Coming in (with ad breaks) at an hour the remake is twice as long and, with no extra quizzing to fill the gap, that time has to be made up elsewhere. A bit of extra chat, some bonus information after some questions, and an overall slower pace do the trick, which together leaves it without the original's trademark 'efficiency'. Understandably, this has disappointed the more devout fans, who were hoping for a return to the veritable barrage of questions that used to grace our teatime TV screens. However, if the remake is viewed on its own merits (rather than in the shadow of William G Stewart) I think it largely stands up to scrutiny.
![]() |
| Sandi with the latest in high-tech question asking technology. |
Fifteen to Fun?
Overall then, it's a perfectly fine remake of an undisputed classic. It will be interesting, however, to see how it fares with the viewing public; ultimately I'm not entirely sure who it's trying to please. For quiz purists it will certainly feel like a rather diluted imitation of the original. The more casual viewer, on the other hand, seems liable to tire of a 'question question question' format once the nostalgia novelty wears off. A 4.30pm time slot is a curious choice, as it means an overlap with gameshow goliaths Pointless and The Chase. Perhaps the idea is to lure viewers in and hope they'll hang on to 'see what happens', but as the opening round suffers the most from the ponderous pacing I'm not so sure.
For now, though, I'm happy to have it back. Perhaps there's a touch of expat-induced homesickness creeping in from my new life in the colonies, but while they may be slightly slower on their feet, it's always nice to see an old friend again.
Sunday, 2 March 2014
Review: Revenge of the Egghead
The Ones That Got Away is changing schedule! The regular weekly review of questions we've missed in pub quizzes will now be appearing on Fridays - starting with a bumper One Year Anniversary Special later this week. Adjust your watches accordingly!
Like all cool dudes, little in life excites me more than a new quiz show, and few have been more hotly anticipated than Revenge of the Egghead, 12 Yard's latest BBC2 offering. Self-styled 'bad boy' of British quizzing CJ de Mooi takes on five normal folk in a slightly weird, but ultimately enjoyable, teatime trivia test.
The basics
![]() |
| Still waiting for that quiz-based Bond villain. |
A team of five contestants tackle questions in turn to build up a cash pot with each correct answer putting £200 in the kitty. If someone gets one wrong and CJ knows the answer he can hit his Big Red Button and the unlucky soul is put on the 'hot spot' where a trickier (albeit multiple choice) question threatens to cost them a life. Lose two lives and it's bus fare home o'clock.
After a semi-arbitrary amount of time (usually about 15 minutes) the surviving contestants combine their brains - and their remaining lives - to take on the Egghead for the money. Here, CJ gets 10 questions with which to set a target for the challengers to beat. All they have to do is outscore him before incorrect answers cost them their pooled lives and whatever they've banked is shared between them. Lose, and all they get is a nicely hammed up smirk.
The good
The fundamentals, then, are fairly solid. Questions are of a good difficulty and largely fast-paced, with relatively little of the 'I think it's London because it's not another city and because that's the answer' banality that plagues many a modern quiz show. Even the hot spot element, which has considerable potential for tedious, time-wasting kerfuffle, is incorporated fairly seamlessly. Host Jeremy Vine is, well, Jeremy Vine, so at least you know where you are (even if he often seems unsure himself).
The not-so-good
![]() |
| The show is apparently set in de Mooi's (very shiny) alien spaceship. |
It is tough, however, to see a way out of what are clearly some quite tight financial constraints. A basic difficulty is that unlike some similarly budgeted shows (such as Eggheads and Pointless) we're not being presented with a team per se, but a group of strangers. If a couple win £1,000 on Pointless you can at least pretend they go off and spend the money together, whereas here you know they're all just thinking about their (fairly small) share. The tactic of rolling over unwon money, meanwhile, doesn't sit with the central idea of a team building a jackpot. Instead, then, you're looking for an in-game mechanic which really narrows down the options. Perhaps if the team could 'buy' money with remaining lives (or as a reward for beating CJ with lives to spare) they could bump up the total on offer without too much extra risk, but it's obviously hard to judge from an outsider's perspective.
![]() |
| CJ looking bored. Or possibly sleepy. |
It doesn't help that CJ hasn't really grown into his role yet. He's quite good at looking bored, and rolling his eyes, and looking bored again, but otherwise it's a fairly obvious act which nobody is truly buying. By comparison, The Chasers are much less one-dimensional, often tailoring their attitude to individual contestants and the general state of a game. CJ is afforded neither the time nor the opportunity to establish anything near that level of personalization, leaving us instead to wonder why this rather thin man is so angry with Dave from Stevenage and Louise from Manchester.
The conclusion
These are, however, the mere window-dressings of what is still a perfectly watchable show. From a quizzer's perspective I care far more about the quality - and quantity - of questions than whether CJ can pull off the tricky single-raised-eyebrow-smirk combo, and on the former it performs better than most. The format itself is interesting and, although its implementation doesn't do anything for me, I don't doubt there are plenty who boo and cheer in all the right places. I do wonder, however, whether you could replace CJ with another (carefully chosen) contestant also fighting for some cash and do away with the whole 'revenge' angle altogether. While a good quizzer, CJ is not a particularly great one, and I suspect enough non-professional quizzers of a similar calibre could be found to fill a series this way (although admittedly without CJ's personality the host would need to pick up a lot of slack).
Still, Revenge of the Egghead will be part of my regularly scheduled programming for the time being, and for the questions alone I'd recommend it to most moderate-level quizzers. I'm also keeping an eye out for the appearance one Lisa Thiel who, if you haven't heard, is the latest addition to the regular cast of Eggheads. Apparently her performance against CJ helped her get that particular gig, so I'm anticipating fireworks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






